The first phase of the project involves developing a process to review and evaluate the adherence of a jurisdiction's regulatory framework to generally accepted principles for due process, transparency and comity for a national agency's regulatory action based on a set of objective criteria; and the national agency's effectiveness in adhering to these generally accepted principles. The current comparative report reviews and evaluates ten jurisdictions:<\/p>

• Australia<\/li>
• Brazil<\/li>
• Canada<\/li>
• China<\/li>
• European Union<\/li>
• India<\/li>
• Korea<\/li>
• Taiwan<\/li>
• United Kingdom<\/li>
• United States<\/li><\/ul>

  The second phase of this project will involve conducting an in-country survey of experts, practitioners, and stakeholders utilizing the same objective criteria to determine how effective a jurisdiction\u2019s regulatory framework and its national agency\u2019s adherence are to generally-accepted principles for due process, transparency, and comity from the perspective of those \u201con the ground\u201d that are impacted by national agency regulatory actions.<\/p>

  The results of the Phase II findings will be published in a report in 2022.<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n <\/div>\n\n\t\t\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  Competition Regulatory Agency […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"parent":26050,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"elementor_header_footer","meta":{"_oasis_is_in_workflow":0,"_oasis_original":0},"categories":[],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n