About USC Gould
USC Gould is a top-ranked law school with a 115-year history and reputation for academic excellence. We are located on the beautiful 228-acre USC University Park Campus, just south of downtown Los Angeles.
Learn about our rigorous and interdisciplinary curriculum, our invaluable experiential learning opportunities, and the breadth and depth of our specialized areas of concentration and certificate offerings.
- Student Life
Participate in an unparalleled learning experience with diversity of people and thought. Get involved in the law school community and participate in activities that enhance your studies.
We work closely with students, graduates and employers to support successful career goals and outcomes. Our overall placement rate is consistently strong, with 94 percent of our JD class employed within 10 months after graduation.
Our faculty is distinguished for its scholarship, as well as for its commitment to teaching. Our 12:1 student-to-faculty ratio creates an intimate and collegial learning environment.
- Alumni and Giving
Alumni and Giving
The global Trojan network of more than 10,000 law alumni and donors include recognized leaders in numerous fields who are deeply committed to supporting student and law school success.
- FACULTY DIRECTORY
- LECTURERS IN LAW DIRECTORY
- EXPERTS DIRECTORY
- FACULTY IN THE NEWS
- SCHOLARSHIP AND PUBLICATIONS
- DISTINCTIONS AND AWARDS
- + CENTERS
- CENTER FOR LAW AND PHILOSOPHY (CLP)
- CENTER FOR LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (CLASS)
- CENTER FOR LAW, HISTORY AND CULTURE (CLHC)
- CENTER FOR TRANSNATIONAL LAW AND BUSINESS (CTLB)
- INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM INSTITUTE (IRI)
- PACIFIC CENTER FOR HEALTH POLICY AND ETHICS
- SAKS INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH LAW, POLICY, AND ETHICS
- WORKSHOPS AND CONFERENCES
Dan Simon specializes in the field of Law & Psychology. He teaches Criminal Law, as well as various courses in the intersection of law and psychology. He also teaches a course on law and psychology at the USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences.
Simon is the author of In Doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice Process (Harvard University Press, 2012). Following the publication of In Doubt, Simon has been invited to lecture on the psychological dimensions of the criminal justice process to groups of judges, prosecutors and police personnel across the United States and in Israel.
Simon’s publications in law reviews include "The Limited Diagnosticity of Criminal Trials" (Vanderbilt Law Review, 2011); "A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making" (The University of Chicago Law Review, 2004), and "A Psychological Model of Judicial Decision Making" (Rutgers Law Journal, 1988). He has also published a number of articles in experimental psychological journals, including "The Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction" (Psychological Science, 2004; with co-authors), "The Redux of cognitive consistency theories: Evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction" (Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004; with co-authors), and Bidirectional Reasoning in Decision Making by Constraint Satisfaction (Journal of Experimental Psychology—General, 1999, with Keith J. Holyoak).
Simon has been a visiting professor at Yale Law School, Harvard Law School, Columbia Law School, and the Max Planck Institute in Germany. He earned an SJD degree from Harvard Law School, an MBA from INSEAD in France, and an LLB from Tel Aviv University. He worked as an attorney for the Association for Civil Rights in Israel as human rights lawyer on the West Bank. Before joining the USC Gould School of Law in 1999, Simon was a member of the faculty of the University of Haifa Law School. He serves as an ad hoc referee for academic presses, peer reviewed journals in experimental psychology, and the National Science Foundation.
Works in Progress
- "On Juror Decision Making: An Empathic Inquiry" (in press; Annual Review of Law and Social Science)
- The Adversarial Mindset (under review; with Minwoo Ahn, Douglas Stenstrom & Stephen J. Read)
- Ghostwritten Testimony (draft available).
- Towards a General Framework of Cognitive Bias (in preparation; with Stephen J. Read)
- "Thin Empirics, Comment on Allen & Pardo: Relative Plausibility and Its Critics, " 23 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 82-89 (2019) - (SSRN)
- "Minimizing Error and Bias in Death Investigations," In Symposium: Experts, Inference and Innocence. 49 Seton Hall Law Review 255 (2019) - (SSRN)
- "Neither Cognitive Nor Consistency: A Comment on 'Cognitive Consistency Theory in Social Psychology: A Paradigm Reconsidered'" (with Stephen J. Read), 29 Psychological Inquiry 97-108 (2018) - (SSRN)
- "The Elasticity of Preferences" (with Stephen A. Spiller). 27 Psychological Science 1588-1599 (2016). - (www)
- "The Coherence Effect: Blending Cold and Hot Cognitions" (with Doug Stenstrom & Stephen J. Read). 109 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 369-394 (2015). - (SSRN)
- "Turn to Accuracy." In Special Symposium: Criminal Law at the Crossroads. 87 Southern California Law Review 421 (2014) - (SSRN)
- "The Effect of Legal Expert Commentary on Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision Making" (with Nicholas Scurich). 10 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 797-814 (2013) - (SSRN)
- "Judicial Overstating," In Special Symposium: The Supreme Court and the American Public, (with Nicholas Scurich). 88 Chicago-Kent Law Review 411 (2013) - (SSRN)
In Doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice Process (www), (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012 - www). Released by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press (In Chinese, 2017); Released by Hakjisa Press (in Korean; 2017); to be released by Keiso Shobo Press (in Japanese; 2020).
Reviews of In Doubt: The Psychology of the Criminal Justice Process:
- Brandon L. Garrett, "The Banality of Wrongful Executions," 112 Michigan Law Review 979. (Link)
- Eddie Greene & Brian H. Bornstein, "Nudging the Justice System Towards Better Decisions" 103 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 1155-1170 (2013). (Link)
- Samuel Weiss, “Psychology’s Reasonable Doubts” Harvard Civil Rights - Civil Liberties Law Review (July, 2013). (Link)
- Robert Costello, 40 Criminal Justice and Behavior 349-350 (March 2013). (Link)
- Patrick Ince, 104 British Journal of Psychology 143-145 (2013). (Link)
- Sawyer Sylvester, Law and Politics Review 507-510 (2012). (Link)
- George C. Thomas III, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Books (September 2012). (Link)
- Gary L. Wells, 96 American Judicature Society (July - August 2012). (Link)
- Lauren-Brooke Eisen, New York Law Journal (July 3, 2012). (Link)
- Bryan Mossop, Scientific American, (November 30, 2012). (Link)
- "Parallel Constraint Satisfaction as a Mechanism for Cognitive Consistency" (with Stephen J. Read). In Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition (B. Gawronsky & F. Strack, eds.), pp. 66-86 (New York: Guilford Press, 2012).
- "More Problems with Criminal Trials: the Limited Effectiveness of Trial Mechanisms." 75 Law & Contemporary Problems 167 (2012, no.2). - (SSRN)
- "Lay Judgments of Judicial Decision-Making" (with Nicholas Scurich). 8 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 709-727 (2011). - (SSRN)
- "The Limited Diagnosticity of Criminal Trials." 64 Vanderbilt Law Review 143 (2011). - (SSRN)
- "In Praise of Pedantic Eclecticism: Pitfalls and Opportunities in the Psychology of Judging," in The Psychology of Judicial Decision Making (with David E. Klein and Gregory Mitchell, eds.) 131-147 (Oxford University Press, 2010). - (SSRN)
- "The Transience of Constructed Preferences" (with Daniel C. Krawczyk, Airom Bleicher, & Keith J. Holyoak). 21 Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1-14 (2008). - (SSRN)
- "Construction of Preferences by Constraint Satisfaction" (with Daniel C. Krawczyk, & Keith J. Holyoak). 15 Psychological Science 331-336 (2004), reprinted in The Construction of Preference, S. Lichtenstein and P. Slovic eds., pp. 235-245 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007). - (SSRN)
- "A Third View of the Black Box: Cognitive Coherence in Legal Decision Making." 71 University of Chicago Law Review 511 (2004). - (SSRN)
- "The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction" (with Chadwick J. Snow, & Stephen J. Read). 86 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 814-837 (2004). - (SSRN)
- "Effects of Individual Expertise and Task Importance on Pre-decision Reevaluation of Alternatives" (with Aaron L. Brownstein & Stephen J. Read). 30 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 819-904 (2004).
- "Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction" (with Keith J. Holyoak). 6 Personality and Social Psychology Review 283-294 (2002). - (SSRN)
- "Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Look Through the Lens of Cognitive Psychology." 67 Brooklyn Law Review 1097 (2002). - (Hein)
- "The Emergence of Coherence Over the Course of Decision Making" (with Lien B. Pham, Quang A. Le, & Keith J. Holyoak). 27 Journal of Experimental Psychology—Learning, Memory & Cognition 1250-1260 (2001). - (PDF)
- "The Double-Consciousness of Judging: The Problematic Legacy of Cardozo." 79 Oregon Law Review 1033 (2000). - (Hein)
- "Bidirectional Reasoning in Decision Making by Constraint Satisfaction" (with Keith J. Holyoak). 128 Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 3-31 (1999). - (PDF)
- "A Psychological Model of Judicial Decision Making.” 30 Rutgers Law Journal 1 (1998). - (Hein)
- "The Demolition of Homes in the Israeli Occupied Territories." 19 Yale Journal of International Law 1 (1994). - (Hein)
- What’s the Right Police Body Camera Policy? (with Jim Bueermann): Los Angeles Times, August 24, 2015 - (www)
- Sobering Lessons From the Lone Juror in the Etan Patz Case, The Huffington Post: The Blog, May 15, 2015 - (www)
- DNA Testing Could Save Texas Man’s Life, CNN Opinion, November 25, 2014 - (www)
- Front-end and Back-end Solutions (Sept. 2014). Mending Justice: Sentinel Event Reviews, National Institute of Justice, Department of Justice, at p. 28 - (www)
- To Hell with the Truth. The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Conversation, October 15, 2012.
- Bringing the DA’s Office into the 21st Century. The Daily Journal, October 8, 2012.
- Reforming the Criminal Justice System. The Huffington Post. May 30, 2012.
- Israel’s Settlement Liability. Los Angeles Times, May 25, 2011.
- A publicity stunt from Larimer County District Attorney. The Rocky Mountain News, Colorado, November 28, 2008.
- Coherence in Perceptions of a Romantic Relationship (with Aaron L. Brownstein and Stephen J. Read) (published in The Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2004).
- Constraint Satisfaction Processes in Social Reasoning (with Stephen J. Read and Chadwick J. Snow) (published in The Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 2003).
- "Israel On the Verge of a Bill of Rights," 9 Israel Studies Bulletin 9 (1993).
FACULTY IN THE NEWS
Niels W. Frenzen was quoted about the case of Scott Warren, an activist who was arrested and charged with harboring and conspiring to transport undocumented immigrants. In 2017, a directive from then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions to prioritize cases involving the transportation of undocumented immigrants,"brought to a head the conflict between immigration enforcement and a sanctuary movement that reaches back to the 1980s," explained Frenzen. "While maintaining a spiritual element, the movement has become more political and less religious...especially as the Trump administration draws stark battle lines on immigration," he said. Frenzen's quote was also mentioned in the National Post, Daily Herald, Calgary Herald, Montreal Gazette, Leader Post, Ottawa Citizen, The London Free Press, The Star Phoenix, Canada.com, The Salt Lake Tribune, and The Province.
“Labor and Employment Law Jeopardy,” Los Angeles County Bar Association’s Labor and Employment Section Annual Retreat, Westlake Village, CA.
Hannah Garry co-facilitated "#MeToo" at the International Human Rights Clinicians Conference held at the Univeristy of Pennsylvania Law School.
Thomas D. Lyon
Tom Lyon received a one-year $250,000 grant from the California Office of Emergency Services Child Advocacy Center Program for his and his lab's interviewing work in the Los Angeles County Dependency Court.