Content start here
News

U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

USC Gould School of Law • June 11, 2007
Contact: USC Law News Service, (213) 740-9690
               Gilien Silsby, (213) 500-8673 (cell)
                E-mail: [email protected]
          
 
MEDIA ADVISORY
 
USC Law School Experts: U.S. Supreme Court Cases
 
As the U.S. Supreme Court heads into the final month of its term, it is expected to deliver several key decisions. The most anticipated include cases addressing race in public schools, free speech and campaign spending.
 
USC Law School professors are available to discuss the following cases:
 
FREE SPEECH
(Morse v. Frederick) May students carry signs at school-sponsored events that may offend the principal? This case involves a student group who was punished for waving a banner with “Bong Hits 4 Jesus.”

    MICHAEL SHAPIRO
    213-740-2516
    Constitutional law professor
 
    DAVID CRUZ
    213-740-6830 
    Constitutional law professor 
 
CAR SEARCHES
(Brendlin v. California): Are passengers who are riding in a car stopped by police within their rights to walk away from the scene or are they legally bound to stay as police question the driver?
   
    CHARLES WHITEBREAD
    310-245-2102
    Constitutional law professor
 
    DAVID CRUZ
    213-740-6830 
    Constitutional law professor

RACE
(Parents Involved in Community School v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education): Two cases ask whether public school systems can take race into account in maintaining balance in individual schools.
 
    DARIA ROITHMAYR
    213-740-6228
    Law professor, specializing in race and the law
 
    KAREEM CRAYTON
    213-740-2516 or 213-446-8800 (cell)
    Law and politics professor
 
    DAVID CRUZ
    213-740-6830 
    Constitutional law professor

CAMPAIGN SPENDING 
(Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life) May groups use corporate dollars to sponsor political advertisements before an election (prohibited under the McCain-Feingold Act)?
   
    KAREEM CRAYTON
    213-446-8800 (cell)
    Law and politics professor
 
IPOS
(Credit Suisse v. Billing): Looks at antitrust immunity in the setting of SEC-regulated stock offering.
    
    JAMES SPINDLER 
    213-740-6372
    Business law professor
 
PATENTS
(Microsoft v. AT&T)
 
    JENNIFER URBAN
    213-740-1538
    Director of the Intellectual Property Law Clinic

Explore Related

Related Stories